Screener
ISCV vs DFAS
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
Key differences
- ISCV costs 0.20% less per year.
- DFAS is significantly larger than ISCV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISCV follows a index tracking strategy; DFAS uses active selection.
- DFAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCV | DFAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $651M | $14.0B |
| Since | 2004 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 1.90% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.48% | 16.89% |
| Max drawdown | -51.56% | -26.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCV and DFAS
Explore further