Screener
ISCV vs FNK
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF vs First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- ISCV costs 0.68% less per year.
- ISCV is significantly larger than FNK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ISCV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ISCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISCV | FNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.74% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $651M | $217M |
| Since | 2004 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.90% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.7% | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.48% | 15.67% |
| Max drawdown | -51.56% | -50.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISCV and FNK
Explore further