Screener
ISHP vs CARZ
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF vs First Trust S-Network Future Vehicles & Technology ETF
Key differences
- ISHP costs 0.10% less per year.
- CARZ is significantly larger than ISHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CARZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CARZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISHP | CARZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $51M |
| Since | 2016 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.1% | +114.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | +35.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | +18.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.44 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.08% | 26.03% |
| Max drawdown | -47.57% | -51.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISHP and CARZ
Explore further