Screener
ISHP vs FTCS
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF vs First Trust Capital Strength ETF
Key differences
- FTCS costs 0.07% less per year.
- FTCS is significantly larger than ISHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISHP covers global markets; FTCS covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, ISHP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FTCS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISHP | FTCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $7.9B |
| Since | 2016 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.1% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.44 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.08% | 9.95% |
| Max drawdown | -47.57% | -31.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISHP and FTCS
Explore further