Screener
ISHP vs FTLS
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF vs First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
Key differences
- ISHP costs 0.78% less per year.
- FTLS is significantly larger than ISHP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISHP is classified as equity, while FTLS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ISHP covers global markets; FTLS covers north america.
- ISHP follows a index tracking strategy; FTLS uses long short.
- Over the last 3 years, FTLS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISHP | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2016 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.1% | +15.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.1% | +14.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.44 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.08% | 8.19% |
| Max drawdown | -47.57% | -20.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISHP and FTLS
Explore further