Screener
ISMF vs EAOM
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF
Key differences
ISMF is an alternative ETF, while EAOM is a mixed asset ETF. ISMF charges 0.80% a year and EAOM 0.18%.
- ISMF is an alternative fund, while EAOM is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; EAOM uses active selection.
- ISMF covers global markets; EAOM covers North America.
- EAOM costs 0.62% less per year.
- ISMF is much larger than EAOM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EAOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | EAOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $59M | $9M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.02% | 6.76% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -20.73% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.