Screener
ISMF vs FMF
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.18% less per year.
- FMF is significantly larger than ISMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | FMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $57M | $266M |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.50% | 5.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | managed futures | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.87% | 9.65% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -16.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISMF and FMF
Explore further