Screener
ISMF vs PIT
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
Key differences
- PIT costs 0.25% less per year.
- PIT is significantly larger than ISMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISMF is classified as alternative, while PIT is commodity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | PIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $57M | $240M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.50% | 6.17% |
| Asset class | alternative | commodity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | managed futures | — |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.1% | +58.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.87% | 21.44% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -12.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ISMF and PIT
Explore further