Screener
ISRA vs BFLX
VanEck Israel ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
Both ISRA and BFLX are equity ETFs. ISRA charges 0.59% a year and BFLX 0.40%. The main difference: ISRA follows a index tracking strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
- ISRA follows a index tracking strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
- ISRA covers emerging markets; BFLX covers global markets.
- BFLX costs 0.19% less per year.
- ISRA is much larger than BFLX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISRA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISRA | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $167M | $11M |
| Since | 2013 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.14% | — |
| Max drawdown | -45.02% | -2.56% |
Similar to ISRA and BFLX
Explore further