Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ISSB vs AOR

IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

ISSB

IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF

Annual cost

1.14%

Fund size

$2M

AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.6B

Key differences

ISSB is an alternative ETF, while AOR is a mixed asset ETF. ISSB charges 1.14% a year and AOR 0.15%.

  • ISSB is an alternative fund, while AOR is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ISSB follows a option income strategy; AOR uses active selection.
  • AOR costs 0.99% less per year.
  • AOR is much larger than ISSB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ISSBAOR
Annual cost (TER)1.14%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$3.6B
Since20262008
Dividend yield2.47%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1YN/A+16.8%
CAGR 3YN/A+14.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.7%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.07
Volatility 1Y8.66%
Max drawdown-30.57%-22.95%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ISSB and AOR