Screener
ITWO vs IWMI
ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF vs NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
Key differences
- ITWO costs 0.13% less per year.
- IWMI is significantly larger than ITWO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ITWO is classified as equity, while IWMI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ITWO follows a index tracking strategy; IWMI uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| ITWO | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $178M | $806M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 10.36% | 13.68% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.3% | +38.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.67% | 14.84% |
| Max drawdown | -24.77% | -23.88% |
Similar to ITWO and IWMI
Explore further