Screener
IUSB vs BINC
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Key differences
- IUSB costs 0.34% less per year.
- IUSB follows a index tracking strategy; BINC uses active selection.
- IUSB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IUSB | BINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36.5B | $16.9B |
| Since | 2014 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.24% | 5.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.66% | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -17.90% | -2.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IUSB and BINC
Explore further