Screener
IUSB vs DFCF
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF vs Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- IUSB costs 0.11% less per year.
- IUSB is significantly larger than DFCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IUSB follows a index tracking strategy; DFCF uses active selection.
- IUSB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IUSB | DFCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.06% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36.5B | $10.1B |
| Since | 2014 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.24% | 4.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.66% | 4.04% |
| Max drawdown | -17.90% | -19.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IUSB and DFCF
Explore further