Screener
IUSG vs IWF
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IUSG costs 0.14% less per year.
- IWF is significantly larger than IUSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IUSG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IUSG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30.1B | $124.7B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.5% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.1% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.6% | +15.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.81% | 15.55% |
| Max drawdown | -32.35% | -32.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IUSG and IWF
Explore further