Screener
IUSG vs RPG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- IUSG costs 0.31% less per year.
- IUSG is significantly larger than RPG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IUSG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IUSG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IUSG | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30.1B | $1.8B |
| Since | 2000 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.5% | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.1% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.6% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.81% | 19.62% |
| Max drawdown | -32.35% | -36.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IUSG and RPG
Explore further