Screener
IUSV vs BSMC
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF vs Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- IUSV costs 0.67% less per year.
- IUSV is significantly larger than BSMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IUSV follows a index tracking strategy; BSMC uses active selection.
- IUSV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IUSV | BSMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.71% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25.6B | $164M |
| Since | 2000 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.14% | 14.75% |
| Max drawdown | -37.54% | -19.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IUSV and BSMC
Explore further