Screener
IUSV vs QGRO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF vs American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- IUSV costs 0.25% less per year.
- IUSV is significantly larger than QGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IUSV follows a index tracking strategy; QGRO uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, QGRO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IUSV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IUSV | QGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $25.6B | $2.2B |
| Since | 2000 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 0.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.14% | 15.36% |
| Max drawdown | -37.54% | -32.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IUSV and QGRO
Explore further