Screener
IVRS vs FENI
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Key differences
- FENI costs 0.19% less per year.
- FENI is significantly larger than IVRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IVRS follows a index tracking strategy; FENI uses active selection.
- FENI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVRS | FENI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $9.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 2.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.0% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.46 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.71% | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -14.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVRS and FENI
Explore further