Screener
IVRS vs IWL
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.32% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than IVRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVRS | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.0% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.6% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.46 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.71% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -31.43% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVRS and IWL
Explore further