Screener
IVSX vs BCFN
Applied Finance IVS International SMID ETF vs Baron Financials ETF
Key differences
Both IVSX and BCFN are equity ETFs. IVSX charges 0.75% a year and BCFN 0.80%. The main difference: IVSX covers global markets excluding the US; BCFN covers global markets.
- IVSX covers global markets excluding the US; BCFN covers global markets.
- IVSX costs 0.05% less per year.
- BCFN is much larger than IVSX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCFN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVSX | BCFN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $47M |
| Since | 2026 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.97% | -20.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.