Screener
IVV vs BDYN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- IVV costs 0.37% less per year.
- IVV is significantly larger than BDYN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IVV is classified as equity, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- IVV follows a index tracking strategy; BDYN uses active selection.
- IVV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVV | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $797.5B | $2.7B |
| Since | 2000 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.12% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.90% | -10.85% |
Similar to IVV and BDYN
Explore further