Screener
IVV vs BLCR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Large Cap Core Active ETF
Key differences
- IVV costs 0.33% less per year.
- IVV is significantly larger than BLCR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IVV covers north america markets; BLCR covers global.
- IVV follows a index tracking strategy; BLCR uses active selection.
- IVV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IVV | BLCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $797.5B | $5.1B |
| Since | 2000 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.12% | 0.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +49.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.96% | 15.61% |
| Max drawdown | -33.90% | -21.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IVV and BLCR
Explore further