Screener
IWB vs BBH
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
Both IWB and BBH are equity ETFs. IWB charges 0.15% a year and BBH 0.35%. The main difference: IWB costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWB costs 0.20% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than BBH. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48.9B | $367M |
| Since | 2000 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.0% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.39% | 19.41% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -39.86% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.