Screener
IWB vs IMTB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
IWB is an equity ETF, while IMTB is a fixed income ETF. IWB charges 0.15% a year and IMTB 0.06%.
- IWB is an equity fund, while IMTB is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- IMTB costs 0.09% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than IMTB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48.9B | $280M |
| Since | 2000 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.22% | 4.05% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -18.15% |
Similar to IWB and IMTB
Explore further