Screener
IWB vs IYG
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.23% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than IYG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | IYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $2.0B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.5% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 15.46% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -44.32% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and IYG
Explore further