Screener
IWB vs IYH
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.23% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than IYH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | IYH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $2.8B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 14.63% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -28.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and IYH
Explore further