Screener
IWB vs LRGF
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.07% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than LRGF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB follows a index tracking strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $3.3B |
| Since | 2000 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +13.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -36.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and LRGF
Explore further