Screener
IWB vs VTHR
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTHR costs 0.09% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than VTHR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | VTHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $5.8B |
| Since | 2000 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.8% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +12.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 12.43% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -34.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWB and VTHR
Explore further