Screener
IWF vs ACGR
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs American Century ETF Trust - American Century Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWF follows a index tracking strategy; ACGR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IWF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWF | ACGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124.7B | — |
| Since | 2000 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +25.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.4% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.5% | +15.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.55% | 15.56% |
| Max drawdown | -32.72% | -34.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWF and ACGR
Explore further