Screener
IWF vs ILCG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
Key differences
- ILCG costs 0.14% less per year.
- IWF is significantly larger than ILCG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ILCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWF | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124.7B | $2.9B |
| Since | 2000 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.4% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.5% | +15.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.55% | 16.38% |
| Max drawdown | -32.72% | -35.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWF and ILCG
Explore further