Screener
IWF vs IVV
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Key differences
- IVV costs 0.15% less per year.
- IVV is significantly larger than IWF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWF | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124.7B | $797.5B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.1% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.8% | +14.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.52% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -32.72% | -33.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWF and IVV
Explore further