Screener
IWF vs IWM
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, IWF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWF | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124.7B | $76.9B |
| Since | 2000 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.4% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.5% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.55% | 19.22% |
| Max drawdown | -32.72% | -41.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWF and IWM
Explore further