Screener
IWF vs MMLG
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWF costs 0.67% less per year.
- IWF is significantly larger than MMLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWF follows a index tracking strategy; MMLG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IWF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWF | MMLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124.7B | $88M |
| Since | 2000 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.4% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.5% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.55% | 18.13% |
| Max drawdown | -32.72% | -45.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWF and MMLG
Explore further