Screener
IWF vs TMDV
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- IWF costs 0.17% less per year.
- IWF is significantly larger than TMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IWF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWF | TMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $124.7B | $4M |
| Since | 2000 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.5% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.4% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.5% | +2.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.55% | 12.22% |
| Max drawdown | -32.72% | -33.42% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWF and TMDV
Explore further