Screener
IWL vs IHF
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.23% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWL | IHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $777M |
| Since | 2009 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.7% | -0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.34% | 21.56% |
| Max drawdown | -32.71% | -35.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWL and IHF
Explore further