Skip to content
Screener

IWL vs IWV

iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs iShares Russell 3000 ETF

IWL

iShares Russell Top 200 ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$2.2B

IWV

iShares Russell 3000 ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$19.8B

Key differences

Both IWL and IWV are equity ETFs. IWL charges 0.15% a year and IWV 0.20%. The main difference: IWL costs 0.05% less per year.

  • IWL costs 0.05% less per year.
  • IWV is much larger than IWL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IWLIWV
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$2.2B$19.8B
Since20092000
Dividend yield0.82%0.85%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+24.5%+24.5%
CAGR 3Y+22.9%+21.2%
CAGR 5Y+14.1%+12.2%
Sharpe 3Y1.191.11
Volatility 1Y12.68%12.57%
Max drawdown-32.71%-35.22%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to IWL and IWV