Screener
IWL vs RYLD
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.45% less per year.
- IWL is classified as equity, while RYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IWL follows a index tracking strategy; RYLD uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWL | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2009 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.7% | +2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.28 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.34% | 10.82% |
| Max drawdown | -32.71% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWL and RYLD
Explore further