Screener
IWM vs VONE
iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VONE costs 0.13% less per year.
- IWM is significantly larger than VONE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, VONE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWM | VONE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76.9B | $10.8B |
| Since | 2000 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 1.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.22% | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | -41.13% | -34.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWM and VONE
Explore further