Screener
IWMI vs ITWO
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF vs ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF
Key differences
- ITWO costs 0.13% less per year.
- IWMI is significantly larger than ITWO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWMI is classified as alternative, while ITWO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- IWMI follows a option income strategy; ITWO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWMI | ITWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $806M | $178M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 13.68% | 10.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.2% | +44.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.84% | 18.67% |
| Max drawdown | -23.88% | -24.77% |
Similar to IWMI and ITWO
Explore further