Screener
IWO vs CGGR
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
Both IWO and CGGR are equity ETFs. IWO charges 0.24% a year and CGGR 0.39%. The main difference: IWO follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- IWO follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- IWO covers North America; CGGR covers global markets.
- IWO costs 0.15% less per year.
- Over the last three years, CGGR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWO | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.7B | $24.6B |
| Since | 2000 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.40% | 0.09% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.6% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.08% | 17.12% |
| Max drawdown | -42.01% | -28.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.