Screener
IWO vs GGUS
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- GGUS costs 0.12% less per year.
- IWO is significantly larger than GGUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWO | GGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.9B | $423M |
| Since | 2000 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.1% | +25.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.33% | 15.11% |
| Max drawdown | -42.01% | -22.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWO and GGUS
Explore further