Screener
IWO vs RSSL
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.16% less per year.
- IWO is significantly larger than RSSL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWO | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.9B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 1.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.1% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.33% | 19.19% |
| Max drawdown | -42.01% | -27.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWO and RSSL
Explore further