Screener
IWP vs IMCG
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IMCG costs 0.17% less per year.
- IWP is significantly larger than IMCG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IMCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWP | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19.6B | $3.5B |
| Since | 2001 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.0% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.54% | 15.45% |
| Max drawdown | -38.62% | -35.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWP and IMCG
Explore further