Screener
IWR vs FFSM
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF vs Fidelity Covington Trust - Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWR follows a index tracking strategy; FFSM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWR | FFSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52.6B | — |
| Since | 2001 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.8% | +37.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.50% | 17.99% |
| Max drawdown | -40.59% | -26.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWR and FFSM
Explore further