Screener
IWR vs HIMU
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
IWR is an equity ETF, while HIMU is a fixed income ETF. IWR charges 0.18% a year and HIMU 0.39%.
- IWR is an equity fund, while HIMU is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- IWR follows a index tracking strategy; HIMU uses active selection.
- IWR costs 0.21% less per year.
- IWR is much larger than HIMU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWR | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54.8B | $2.3B |
| Since | 2001 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.54% | 4.58% |
| Max drawdown | -40.59% | -8.01% |
Similar to IWR and HIMU
Explore further