Screener
IWS vs BSMC
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF vs Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- IWS costs 0.48% less per year.
- IWS is significantly larger than BSMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWS follows a index tracking strategy; BSMC uses active selection.
- IWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWS | BSMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.71% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.9B | $164M |
| Since | 2001 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.31% | 14.75% |
| Max drawdown | -43.83% | -19.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWS and BSMC
Explore further