Screener
IWS vs MMID
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF vs MFS Active Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWS costs 0.36% less per year.
- IWS is significantly larger than MMID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWS follows a index tracking strategy; MMID uses active selection.
- IWS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWS | MMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14.9B | $34M |
| Since | 2001 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.31% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.83% | -7.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWS and MMID
Explore further