Screener
IWX vs FFLV
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap
Key differences
- IWX costs 0.18% less per year.
- IWX is significantly larger than FFLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWX covers north america markets; FFLV covers global.
- IWX follows a index tracking strategy; FFLV uses active selection.
- IWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWX | FFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $17M |
| Since | 2009 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.4% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.11% | 11.50% |
| Max drawdown | -35.76% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWX and FFLV
Explore further