Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

IWY vs IWO

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

IWY

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$16.5B

IWO

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.24%

Fund size

$13.9B

Key differences

  • Over the last 3 years, IWY has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IWYIWO
Annual cost (TER)0.20%0.24%
Fund size (AUM)$16.5B$13.9B
Since20092000
Dividend yield0.35%0.42%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+28.6%+40.1%
CAGR 3Y+27.2%+18.8%
CAGR 5Y+16.7%+5.9%
Sharpe 3Y1.160.72
Volatility 1Y15.63%21.33%
Max drawdown-32.68%-42.01%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to IWY and IWO