Screener
IXC vs EIPX
iShares Global Energy ETF vs FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.55% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than EIPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EIPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXC | EIPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.8B | $532M |
| Since | 2001 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 2.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.6% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.71% | 11.12% |
| Max drawdown | -64.16% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXC and EIPX
Explore further